Here’s the premise, in a five-step argument:
- For many places, success in the 21st century is different than their visions of 20th- or 19th-century civic success.
- 21st-century places – whether cities, metropolitan areas, counties, towns, or regions that span multiple local governments – have the capacity to succeed.
- Cities, towns, regions and other places can succeed when they can make the choices that are right for success.
- For success to occur, these places must be empowered to act on their choices.
- Good planning can lead to good choices.
“Civic success” is a pretty wide-ranging term (never mind
the fact that I may have just invented this term). Every place will define its
success in a different fashion. Some will focus on economic indicators, others
may focus on social or quality-of-life indicators, some places will focus on
natural resources or environmental indicators, and others will define their
success in completely different terms. That’s okay. The underlying assumption
is that a community’s civic success is defined in a way that is measurable and
that reflects what is important to that community.
No comments:
Post a Comment